Archive for the ‘totalitarianism’ Category

Chancy Murphy

Remember the film Being There? As imdb puts it:
Chance, a simple gardener, has never left the estate until his employer dies. His simple TV-informed utterances are mistaken for profundity.
Now read this post and the comments thread. In case it’s pruned, here’s where Richard Murphy’s pseudo-gnomic utterances have got him so far:

Adrian

August 18th, 2010 at [...]

White liberal racism

Long, excellent post from Edmund Standing begins:
The white liberal is an unhealthy type of creature that you will undoubtedly have encountered, if not in real life, certainly via the media. By ‘liberal’, I do not mean simply someone who has a generally liberal outlook, in the sense of a ‘live and let [...]

Another ploy

Norm has responded to my post about positive rights:
In a post on positive rights Peter tries to sidestep the truth of this claim by arguing that all a government needs to do to preserve freedom of speech is not to interfere with it itself. But what about the need for governments to [...]

Positive rights

You have a jar of candy.
Other people would like some candy, but you keep the jar hidden and take a piece when you want some. I come along and stand next to you, with a sign round my neck saying “Candy Protector”. Now it’s my candy. At least, it’s thanks to me that you have [...]

Right and left

The piece in the Telegraph today, suggesting that left wing people move right as a pack as they age, without realising it, so they are less left wing than they think, is interesting so far as it goes. But there’s a lot of confusion about right and left, as terms, and this piece might just [...]

Question begging, again

Coming back, after a week or so, to the discussion with Norm about question begging, let me start by accepting completely this definition, also quoted by Norm in a later post:
To “beg the question” does not mean to raise or prompt the question. It means to assume in your premises the truth of your [...]

Rephrasing

Wouldn’t this:
What is your favourite piece of political wisdom? > That there are not necessarily solutions to political problems.
be better with one word moved?
That there are not necessarily political solutions to problems.

Killing Jews

Here’s part of an exchange between Davod Horowitz and a student from the Muslim Student Association at the University of California, San Diego:
“I am a Jew,” [Horowitz] said. “The head of Hezbollah has said that he hopes that we will gather in Israel so he doesn’t have to hunt us down globally. For [...]