The new film about Noah is being criticised by Christian groups for factual inaccuracies. Bless.
The bar has been set very high indeed, but this clears it comfortably: Warren Mundine, of course science needs an Indigenous perspective.
The argument, which seeks to place indigenous Australians in a special little box of people who can’t understand or relate to maths or science directly, ends as follows:
To go back to a time when Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture was put into an ethnographic box, as some sort of anthropological curiosity, and excluded from the breadth of mainstream knowledge, including maths and science, is to disadvantage all Australians.
Bless her race-hustling little heart. She’ll have non-white scientists being interviewed about ‘what gravity waves mean for my community and how they make me feel’ next.
After the dignified restraint of the ‘Dance on the Bitch’s Grave’ street party I organised after Thatcher died (“Ha ha the witch is dead” merchandise is still available from our web store), I was disgusted yesterday to see right wing scum saying they ‘admired’ Tony Benn’s conviction, and complimenting him on his personal life. Some went so far as to say they hadn’t always agreed with his politics and, deep in the depthsiest deeps of the lowest right wing gutter – the lowest of the low, people were quoting things Benn had actually said and done!
It’s at times like this I realise that it’s the personal venom of Tories that marks them out as subhumans. Not for them the calm, evidence-based exchange of Marxist opinions. They can never avoid the personal and their hate shines at every moment. Not for nothing did Aneurin Bevan say Tories are “lower than vermin”.
On the imminent demise of Windows XP.
In Tatchell’s own chapter 9, entitled ‘Questioning Ages of Minority and Ages of Consent’ he asks ‘What purpose does it [the age of majority] serve other than reinforcing a set of increasingly quaint, minority moral values left over from the Victorian era?’
The chapter just after Tatchell’s is entitled ‘Ends and Means: How to Make Paedophilia Acceptable….?’ and opens with an account of sexual activity with two 8 year old boys before describing it as ‘all very normal to a libertarian, even to some open-minded parents’.
Peter Tatchell wrote a chapter in a book published by the Paedophile Information Exchange and this post link was retweeted by Louise Mensch on Twitter today.
Peter Tatchell – Sex Brought ‘Great Joy’. To 9 Year Olds http://t.co/HmKrDG54zu
— Aleisha (@katherine1924) March 12, 2014
Reactions to the involvement of Harman, Dromey and Hewitt in the NCCL when PIE was an affiliated organisation have varied. It was all a long time ago. The past is a foreign country. The 1970s were different. And, for Labour diehards, they didn’t agree with PIE, the affiliation preceded their joining, and so on.
These reactions are based on the idea that it’s jarring, contradictory, unlike them that they might have been in an organisation with links to PIE. I suggest it isn’t.
This is what happens when deeply illiberal people get involved in Liberal causes: they don’t have any instinctive or intellectual basis for judgement. Harman, Dromey and Hewitt are deeply illiberal people. In the 1970s they had the same driving motivation they do today and did when in government. They believe that minorities are oppressed, that most people are wicked and need to be herded by their superiors and that they, personally, are those superiors.
There were civil rights issues in the early 1970s, for women, gays, minority races, on a scale that no longer exists. It was the obvious open goal for the Bossy Tendency. But they weren’t coming at these issues from a liberal perspective, so they didn’t get where the line should be drawn, where the right of adults to sleep with whoever the hell they want in the way they want differed from 50 year old men buggering boys – for this was an extraordinarily misguided association by the NCCL of homosexuality with paedophilia, when it comes down to it.
As for Tatchell, he is similar but not identical. He has consistently championed the right of kids to be sexual. Or maybe that should be the fact that they are. Hormones don’t coincide with legislation about the age of consent in many individuals. But the notion of the age of consent is a good one, the power imbalance between a 50 year old man and a 14 year old girl is too great. And he can be terrifyingly illiberal, as when he wants the fruits of everybody’s labour to be controlled by the sort of obsessive nut who is attracted to full-time politics, something he calls ‘economic democracy’.
So they got the bossiness wrong. But, then, they always do.
UPDATE: Peter Tatchell tweeted me to say:
— Peter Tatchell (@PeterTatchell) March 13, 2014
Israel was hit by 50 missiles today, fired from Gaza just days after a ship carrying a consignment of missiles from Iran, in effect, was captured.
I write this at 21:00 on Wednesday 12th March.
The Telegraph has Cameron in Israel while 50 missiles hit as top story on its front page right now.
The Guardian mentions Cameron’s visit but no missiles, not on the front page, not on the World News Page, nor in the Middle East section nor in the Israel section.
The Independent doesn’t mention the missiles on its front page but does trail a story about a suicide bomber’s brother saying the bomber should receive a VC. Its Middle East page doesn’t mention it, but does mention Israeli soldiers shooting someone at a border crossing.
Another source said: “Bob Crow was essentially a moderate in RMT terms.”
As a matter of mild interest, when does reality ever get a look in with these people?
Although it has attracted a small number of very bright people, Marxism is, in general, cleverness for stupid people. You get to use words like ‘hegemony’ and analyse the world, albeit in unusually fatuous terms.
This is why a Marxian-influenced writer like Richard Seymour can conclude, in the piece Tim was discussing, that Communist China’s military build up is because ‘In a very general sense, militarisation could be seen as an integral aspect of capitalism.’
The NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope has photographed the never-before-seen breakup of an asteroid, which has fragmented into as many as 10 smaller pieces. Although fragile comet nuclei have been seen to fall apart as they approach the Sun, nothing like the breakup of this asteroid, P/2013 R3, has ever been observed before in the asteroid belt.